<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newspaper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mturro.com/2007/04/27/newspaper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mturro.com/2007/04/27/newspaper/</link>
	<description>print &#124; culture &#124; digital &#124; media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:11:03 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daily papers, daily magazines, daily print, just can&#8217;t last</title>
		<link>http://mturro.com/2007/04/27/newspaper/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily papers, daily magazines, daily print, just can&#8217;t last</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mturro.com/?p=111#comment-61</guid>
		<description>[...] This seems off to me. Ultimately the problems newspapers face aren&#8217;t really problems of style or design&#8230; they are fundamental problems that stem from the fact that developing stories (the guts of a daily paper) thrive in a more flexible distribution model&#8230; a digital model. The whole notion of a printed daily is becoming increasingly absurd and it doesn&#8217;t really matter whether what&#8217;s printed looks like a newspaper or a magazine. The nature of daily content requires that it be distributed in a digital format&#8230; printing it is much the same as choking it (a point that drives this post on my other, more creatively driven blog, paragraph). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This seems off to me. Ultimately the problems newspapers face aren&#8217;t really problems of style or design&#8230; they are fundamental problems that stem from the fact that developing stories (the guts of a daily paper) thrive in a more flexible distribution model&#8230; a digital model. The whole notion of a printed daily is becoming increasingly absurd and it doesn&#8217;t really matter whether what&#8217;s printed looks like a newspaper or a magazine. The nature of daily content requires that it be distributed in a digital format&#8230; printing it is much the same as choking it (a point that drives this post on my other, more creatively driven blog, paragraph). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
